Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Canadian Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Canadian Mineralogist; April 2008; v. 46; no. 2; p. 467-501; DOI: 10.3749/canmin.46.2.467
© 2008 Mineralogical Association of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schindler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawthorne, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

THE STEREOCHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF INTERSTITIAL COMPLEXES IN URANYL-OXYSALT MINERALS

Michael Schindler§ and Frank C. Hawthorne

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T2N2, Canada

The crystal structures and chemical compositions of uranyl-oxysalt minerals (primarily with sheet structural units) are interpreted in terms of the binary representation – bond-valence approach to the structure and chemistry of oxysalts. There is a coherent relation between the average basicity of the structural unit and [CNin], the average number of bonds to oxygen atoms of the structural unit from the interstitial complex and adjacent structural units. This relation allows calculation of the range of Lewis basicity for specific structural units. The Lewis acidity of an interstitial complex is expressed graphically as a function of the amounts and coordination numbers of monovalent, divalent and trivalent interstitial cations and the amount of interstitial transformer (H2O) groups. The range in Lewis basicity for a specific structural unit may also be expressed graphically, and where there is overlap of the Lewis acidity and Lewis basicity, the valence-matching principle is satisfied, and the details of the possible interstitial complexes can be derived. There are three distinct types of interstitial (H2O) groups: transformer, non-transformer and inverse-transformer. Inverse-transformer (H2O) groups accept three bonds from cations, other (H2O) groups and (OH) groups of the structural unit. Their occurrence is rare and is limited to minerals with low bond-valence distribution factors. Detailed predictions of the number of transformer, non-transformer and inverse-transformer (H2O) groups in the minerals of the meta-autunite, uranophane, phosphuranylite, carnotite, zippeite and uranyl-hydroxy-hydrate groups (and synthetic analogues) are in good agreement with the observed chemical compositions.

Keywords: H2O groups, uranyl minerals, bond-valence theory, acidity, basicity, valence-matching principle, structural unit, interstitial complex.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Association of Canada